मजकूराशीं उडकी मार

विकिपीडिया:Tintto/Archive 2

ह्या फळ्या वीशीं

Ho zaun asa Wikipediacho Tintto! Hangasor akhea somudaien Wikipedia vixim bhasabhas korunk zata.

हो जावन आसा विकिपीडियाचो तिंटो! हांगासर आख्या समुदायेन विकिपीडिया विशीं भासाभास करुंक जाता।

ಹೋ ಜಾವ್ನ್ ಆಸಾ ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಾಚೊ ತಿಂಟೊ! ಹಾಂಗಾಸರ್ ಆಖ್ಯಾ ಸಮುದಾಯೇನ್ ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯ ವಿಶೀಂ ಭಾಸಾಭಾಸ್ ಕರುಂಕ್ ಜಾತಾ.

Previous discussion was archived at विकिपीडिया:Tintto/Archive 1 on 2016-03-18.

UOzurumba (WMF) (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello Goan Konkani Wikipedians!

Apologies as this message is not in your native language, Please help translate to your language.

The WMF Language team wants to make MinT the default machine translation support in Goan Konkani Wikipedia Content Translation. MinT uses the IndicTrans2 machine translation model, which recently has a new version.

Our proposal to set MinT as the default machine translation service in this Wikipedia will expose contributors to open source service by default and allow them to switch to other services if they prefer those services. Contributors can decide to switch to another translation service that is not default if they prefer the service, which will be helpful in analysing user preferences in the future.

The WMF Language team is requesting feedback from members of this community in this thread if making the MinT the default translation service is okay in Goan Konkani Wikipedia. If there are no objections to the above proposal. In that case, MinT will become the default machine translation in this Wikipedia by the end of January 2024.

Thank you for your feedback.

On behalf of the WMF Language team.

The Discoverer (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello @UOzurumba (WMF), thanks for your message. When I use the Content Translation tool, there is already machine translation available. I assumed that this was coming from MinT. If so, then what exactly is changing?

UOzurumba (WMF) (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello The Discoverer,

The MinT translation in gomwiki is set as optional at the moment. Suppose I have not deliberately chosen MinT from the initial translation panel. In that case, I will have the default machine translation service, currently Google Translation, when I start translating. But, If we change the default machine translation to MinT, anybody starting a translation in gomwiki will automatically use the MinT translation support unless the person goes to the initial translation panel to choose another translation.

So, changing the default translation service from Google to MinT will expose the MinT more in Gomwiki because it will become the automatic translation used unless the person translating an article changes it to another translation service.

I hope the above explains what we mean by making MinT the default translation. Please let me know if you have another question.

Thank you!

The Discoverer (चर्चायोगदान)

It seems to me, that in order to decide which should be the default, we should first compare the quality of the automatic translation output that we get from Google Translate and MinT. How can I change my machine translation service in order to evaluate Google Translate and MinT?

UOzurumba (WMF) (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello The Discoverer,

I have included screenshots illustrating how to change the default initial machine translation. You can switch from one machine translation to another as often as possible.

Let me know if this illustration helps.

Thanks!

UOzurumba (WMF) (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello The Discoverer,

The WMF Language team will make MinT the default machine translation in your Wiki by February 6, 2024. Please let me know in this thread before then if you have any objections to having MinT as the default machine translation in Goan Wikipedia.

Thank you so much for your feedback so far.

The Discoverer (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello @UOzurumba (WMF), thanks for you explanation of how to switch the translator, it was helpful.

I tested using both, Google Translate and MinT for a variety of text passages, and both were at a similar level. I'm sorry to say that both are unsatisfactory, because somehow they tend to incorporate significant Marathi vocabulary. It's difficult to say that one holds the edge over the other. So for me, in terms of quality, it doesn't make a huge difference which one is the default. In such a situation, are there any advantages of changing the default from Google Translate to MinT?

UOzurumba (WMF) (चर्चायोगदान)

Thank you, @The Discoverer, for your feedback.

Some of the benefits are:

  • Contributors will contribute to and use open-source initiatives instead of commercial/for-profit support.
  • The engineers will regularly update the translation models in MinT once available since MinT is hosted in the WMF infrastructure.

There are other benefits, but these are the main ones from the users' point of view.

The Discoverer (चर्चायोगदान)

What about the possibility of the Konkani Wikipedia community improving the machine translation model? Will we have to separately get in touch with IndicTrans2?

UOzurumba (WMF) (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello @The Discoverer,

Sorry, I missed answering your question. If your community wants to improve the IndicTrans2 model, you have to contact them separately.

Please confirm your standpoint on having the MinT as default in your wiki. Should the WMF Language team make it default or leave Google as default? Thank you so much for your prompt feedback.

Best regards

The Discoverer (चर्चायोगदान)

As I mentioned earlier, I do not see a difference in the quality of the translation. We can make MinT as default, simply because, most people are aware about the existence of Google Translate, and use it off-Wiki, but they are unaware of the existence of MinT.

"Making MinT a default Machine Translation for your Wikipedia" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 19 फेब्रुवारी 2024 (IST)

"Tech News: 2024-08" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

MediaWiki message delivery 11:18, 13 फेब्रुवारी 2024 (IST)

"Tech News: 2024-07" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear all,

Thank you everyone for following the progress of the Universal Code of Conduct. I am writing to you today to announce the outcome of the ratification vote on the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee Charter. 1746 contributors voted in this ratification vote with 1249 voters supporting the Charter and 420 voters not. The ratification vote process allowed for voters to provide comments about the Charter.

A report of voting statistics and a summary of voter comments will be published on Meta-wiki in the coming weeks.

Please look forward to hearing about the next steps soon.

On behalf of the UCoC Project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:53, 12 फेब्रुवारी 2024 (IST)

"Announcing the results of the UCoC Coordinating Committee Charter ratification vote" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)


Feel free to translate into your language.

Dear Wikimedians,

In January, CIS-A2K successfully concluded several initiatives, and we are pleased to present a comprehensive monthly newsletter summarizing the events and activities of the past month. This newsletter provides an extensive overview of key information, highlighting our diverse range of endeavors.

Conducted Events
  • Roundtable on Digital Cultures
  • Discussion on Disinformation and Misinformation in Wikimedia Projects
  • Roundtable on Digital Access

You can access the newsletter here.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this newsletter, click here.

Regards

"A2K Monthly Report for January 2024" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

Hello!

This is a notification to let you know that a new request for the global bot flag for CommonsDelinker has been started.

Please note that the request will remain open for 14 days starting today. You can leave a comment or opinion on the relevant page!

Best regards --Superpes15 (talk)

"Request for global bot flag for CommonsDelinker" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

MediaWiki message delivery 00:52, 6 फेब्रुवारी 2024 (IST)

"Tech News: 2024-06" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Hello all,

I am reaching out to you today to remind you that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) charter will close on 2 February 2024. Community members may cast their vote and provide comments about the charter via SecurePoll. Those of you who voiced your opinions during the development of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines will find this process familiar.

The current version of the U4C charter is on Meta-wiki with translations available.

Read the charter, go vote and share this note with others in your community. I can confidently say the U4C Building Committee looks forward to your participation.

On behalf of the UCoC Project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 22:30, 31 जानेवारी 2024 (IST)

"Last days to vote on the Charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee" हाका जबाब दी
MediaWiki message delivery (चर्चायोगदान)

MediaWiki message delivery 01:01, 30 जानेवारी 2024 (IST)

"Tech News: 2024-05" हाका जबाब दी
The Discoverer (चर्चायोगदान)

In 2016, the Konkani Wikipedia made Structured Discussions (then known as Flow), the default content model for all discussion pages. The main reason was that our users were finding it difficult to learn the syntax needed to format discussions properly.

Over the past 7 years, Structured Discussions has fallen out of favour due to various reasons, and the code is currently unmaintained, and the extension will eventually be deprecated. Due to this, our request to install Structured Discussions in the Konkani Wiktionary was declined.

In the meanwhile, a feature called Discussion Tools has been developed, which provides many of the functionalities of Structured Discussions that are relevant to our wiki: automatic formatting of discussions, and being able to reply without leaving the page, with a single click.

As a consequence of these developments, it seems that we have to launch the process to switch back from Structured Discussions to using Discussion Tools on normal talk pages. The advantages of this would be:

  • Common discussion system on the Konkani Wikipedia and WIktionary.
  • Searching posts and moving of topics from one page to another is possible in wikitext, but not in Structured Discussions.
  • Discussion Tools is maintained by the developers, but going forward, there will be less and less support for Structured Discussions

A disadvantage that I perceive is that we will have to implement a bot to automatically archive topics when discussion pages get too long.

My proposal is, in the immediate term, to take the following steps:

  • Archive this current community discussion page 'Tintto' and start a fresh page in wikitext.
  • Turn on Topic Containers for pages that have the magic word NEWSECTIONLINK in the Konkani Wikipedia, so that the Tintto will have Topic Containers.

Please reply with your opinions, comments, support or objections below.

"Roadmap for switching from Structured Discussions to Discussion Tools" हाका जबाब दी
"https://gom.wikipedia.org/wiki/विकिपीडिया:Tintto/Archive_2" चे कडल्यान परतून मेळयलें